Since I always hated my CGI set-up here I took the plunge and tried to get pyblosxom running with WSGI. This is more or less a short HOWTO that shows how I did it. I am not sure if this is the best way to do it but it works for me.
Requirements:
WSGI
This comes bundled with the latest python releases, if yours is older the easiest solution is to use easy_install. Just download and install it if you haven't done yet and then call
easy_install wsgiref
mod_python support
Setup:
Put mp_wsgi_handler.py, wsgi_app.py and your config.py in the same directory. Follow the directions in the wsgi_app.py file and put the <Location> entries in your httpd.conf file. Here it is once more. Do not forget to change PythonPath so all the required files are found.
<Location /weblog> PythonDebug Off SetHandler python-program # set PythonPath to the folders containing the files. PythonPath "['/path/to/mp_wsgi_handler', '/path/to/wsgi_app']+sys.path" PythonHandler mp_wsgi_handler::wsgi_handler # This should be the same as the Location above PythonOption ApplicationPath /weblog PythonOption application wsgi_app::application </Location>
That's it you can now access your blog on your server via /weblog. But what if you do not want to use http://<servername>/weblog everytime?
I wanted to do exactly that. My first try was to change
<Location /weblog>
to
<Location />
This more or less worked, but since mod_python now took all requests I was not able to serve static files. I reverted the change and added some .htaccess entries instead.
.htaccess:
RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d [OR] RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/$ RewriteRule ^(?!weblog)(.*)$ /weblog/$1 [QSA,L]
So what are these entries doing?
If the request is not an existing file or directory
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d [OR]
OR it is the base url
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/$
rewrite it to /weblog but only if it isn't already /weblog
RewriteRule ^(?!weblog)(.*)$ /weblog/$1 [QSA,L]
Difficult yes, working yes, solveable in a better way maybe but I do not know how. :)
If you have any questions or comments do not hesitate to ask me.